An Exposition of the Apostles' Creed - Faith in God
1. Faith in God
I believe …
Faith to Live By: by Roland Chia I believe in God the Father Almighty,
An Exposition of the Apostles’ Creed
maker of heaven and earth;
And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord;
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit;
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, dead, and buried;
he descended into hell.
the third day he rose from the dead;
he ascended into heaven,
and sits at the right hand of God the Father Almighty
from there he shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and life everlasting. Amen.
As a baptismal formula, the Creed is structured according to the three-fold question format in Hippolytus’s Apostolic Tradition, which was composed in the early years of the third century. In the early Church, three questions were put to the baptismal candidate: ‘Do you believe in God, the Father Almighty? Do you believe in Jesus Christ, our Saviour? Do you believe in the Holy Spirit, a holy Church, and the forgiveness of sins?’ To each of these questions, the candidate must reply ‘I believe’ before he or she was baptised in the name of the Triune God in relation to which the three parts of the Creed was structured.
The Apostles’ Creed, in its present form, is of course not the only creed that has been formulated by the Church. Other creeds, some of which are more ancient, like the Nicene, the Athanasian, the Ephesian, and the Chalcedonian, were also formulated with the view of articulating the essential tenets of the Christian faith. The Methodist Hymnal contains a number of creeds, some of which are very recent, and some of Korean and African origins. These creeds are similar in substance to the Apostles’ Creed even if their language is somewhat different. Like their older counterparts, these contemporary creeds serve as attempts to enunciate the teachings of the Church.
The Apostles’ Creed begins with the simple statement: ‘I believe’. Theologically, this statement serves as the prefix to all that follows, the fundamental presupposition of all the other assertions made in the Creed. Every statement in the Creed is therefore a faith-statement: faith is their basis, and only by faith can they be understood and grasped. Faith is therefore the indispensable presupposition for our knowledge of the being and acts of God.
What then do we mean by faith? Faith is trust: it is trusting in the God who has revealed himself to be absolutely trustworthy. Faith finds refuge in God. The Swiss-German theologian Karl Barth stresses that faith cannot be understood except relationally because faith has primarily to do with trust. ‘In God alone’, Barth maintains, ‘is there faithfulness, and faith is the trust that we may hold to him, to his promise and to his guidance. To hold to God is to rely on the fact that God is there for me, and to live in this certainty’. To have faith is to en-trust oneself to God.
According to the Bible, faith is a gift from God. This means that faith is not something that man can harness or develop. That is to say, faith is not intrinsic to man but made possible by the grace of God. Faith and grace are therefore inseparable. Faith can never be seen as the contribution on the part of the human being, which establishes for him some sort of claim on God. Faith is an undeserved divine free gift to man, and therefore can never be understood apart from grace – as something ‘natural’.
But faith at the same time is also a real and personal decision on the part of the believer. Faith is not the passive consequence of some irresistible grace, but an active movement God-ward on the part of the believer. This decision, it must be stressed, is a free decision of the believer, the result of divine persuasion, not coercion. In the same way, faith is the decision of the individual, although that decision has as its centre the Christian community. Thus the great Reformer Martin Luther could say that the ‘Christian is a person in his own right; he believes for himself and not on behalf of anyone else’.
Faith, however, also implies knowledge and understanding. Faith trusts because it knows; it has knowledge of the God whom it trusts. So faith is never a leap in the dark, never a mindless religious fanaticism. Neither is faith a blind trust that asks no questions. Here the thought of Anselm, the eleventh century theologian and Archbishop of Canterbury is enlightening. For Anselm, true faith is characterised by its quest for understanding, for true faith is a form of knowledge. The knowledge of faith, to be sure, must not be understood as purely cognitive knowledge. The knowledge of faith is as profound as it is intimate, mysterious as it is personal. The knowledge of faith is similar to our knowledge of another person, and not our knowledge of inanimate objects. It is a knowledge that results from an I-Thou rather than an I-It relationship.
Faith, then, is exclusive: its trust and its loyalty belong to God alone – to this God, the God who has revealed himself in Jesus Christ, and no other god. Barth again makes this point with unusual clarity: ‘… faith is concerned with our holding to God exclusively because God is the One who is faithful. Similarly, the knowledge of faith is also exclusive knowledge – it is the knowledge of the One God who has revealed himself in Jesus Christ’.
The concept of revelation is therefore paramount. Just as the knowledge of God is impossible without faith, so faith is impossible without revelation. Faith is knowledge of the God who has revealed himself. And this revelation took place in a particular person, and in a particular context, although its significance is universal. In the person of the carpenter in Nazareth, God has revealed himself as the Creator and Saviour of the world.
The relationship between faith and reason must now be explored. To say that the knowledge of God is possible only through faith does not mean that human reason has no part to play. We are reminded once again of Anselm’s dictum that true faith always seeks to understand. Reason is placed within the nexus of faith, and plays an instrumental role. Reason ‘discovers’ the inner rationality of the truth that is appropriated by faith. It operates within faith and has no power apart from it to discern the truth of God. The ‘reasonableness’ of faith is therefore to be found in its response to God’s revelation.
Thus theologically speaking, ‘I believe’ has to do with the very basis of everything that is asserted in the Apostles’ Creed. It is also the basis of everything the Christian says about God. To put this differently, faith in God in his revelation is the possibility and the actuality of the Christian’s talk about God. The Christian is a believer who has come to a trusting relationship with God and whose knowledge of God is the result of this relationship.
Thus the Christian’s knowledge of God can never be theoretical or abstract. Theological knowledge is not a ‘belief system’ or even a system of doctrines: it is knowledge of a personal God made possible by grace. In the same way – and this is saying the same thing from a different angle – the doctrines that are found in the Creed must never be seen as something quite detached from the life of the Christian. The Creed does not provide us with abstract propositions about God. They rather bring to expression the Faith by which we must live.
Faith to Live By:
by Roland Chia
I believe in God the Father Almighty,